Tamara Siarhei: “I'm waiting for another provocation”
On
10 October the Minsk City Court considered the cassation appeal of
Tamara Siarhei against the verdict of the Tsentralny District Court
of Minsk, which upheld and justified the official warning about
criminal responsibility for organizing the activities of unregistered
public associations,issued to her by the General Prosecutor's
Office.
Having returned from the conference room, tThe
judicial board of the Minsk City Court, consisting of Minsk city of
its head Volha Ramasheuskaya, Alena Prudnikava and Katsiaryna
Yakutovich, didn't announce its decision, but postponed the trial to
24 October, referring to the need to request from the General
Prosecutor Office the materials which served as the basis for the
warning.
"I believe that the court gave the General
Prosecutor's Office another chance and do not rule out the
possibility of another provocation on the part of the review
institution,” stated Tamara Siarhei.
In her appeal the
lawyer presented evidence that Judge of the Tsentralny District Court
Ivan Maiseichyk switched the subject of evidence, deprived her of the
opportunity to present evidence and the General Prosecutor's Office
defended its position by means of false and fraudulent evidence.
In
particular, a representative of the Prosecutor General's Office
presented as evidence a copy of the hybrid mail which had been
allegedly sent by Tamara Siarhei.
“However, my signature is
missing on this document. Moreover, according to the official seal of
the post office, the letter was sent on 10 July 2012 at 4.16 p.m. and
received on 9 July 2012 according to the seal of the Administration
of the President of the Republic of Belarus. This evidence can cause
just one question: does the time run backwards for the officials of
the Administration of the President of the Republic of Belarus or the
Office of the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Belarus?",
argued Tamara Siarhei.