HRD's demand immediate review of the sentences and release of the 3 political prisoners

2022 2022-06-07T16:00:03+0300 2022-06-07T19:21:53+0300 en https://spring96.org/files/images/sources/protest_tutby_photo.jpg The Human Rights Center “Viasna” The Human Rights Center “Viasna”
The Human Rights Center “Viasna”

Joint statement by the Belarusian human rights community

June 7, 2022

We, representatives of the human rights community in Belarus, note the continued inappropriate practice of convicting to knowingly disproportionate criminal penalties for protesters who have resisted the police in response to violations of their constitutional rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.

In particular:

  • Mr. Andrei Siarheyenkau was convicted under Article 363 of the Criminal Code to three years and six months of imprisonment in a penal colony for resisting arrest and for spraying tear gas at the police while participating in a peaceful assembly on Freedom Square in Polack in the evening of August 9, 2020;
  • Mr. Aliaksandr Sakalouski was convicted under Article 363 of the Criminal Code to 24 months of imprisonment in a penal colony for resisting arrest for wearing headphones with national symbols on them, which the police officer treated as an unauthorized picket;
  • Mr. Dzmitryi Padlobnikau was sentenced under Article 364 of the Criminal Code to 3 years in a penal colony for hitting the police shields during the dispersal of a peaceful protest in Žlobin on August 9, 2020, which was considered as resistance to the police.

In this regard, reaffirming our position set out in the Joint statement of human rights organizations of January 16, 2021we note the following:

Citizens’ peaceful assemblies should be protected by the state, and the police should not take actions to forcibly stop them, even if they take place in violation of the procedures for their organization and holding. Violent dispersal of assemblies and the use of physical force, let alone special weapons against protesters should be carried out only as an extreme measure, in cases when the behavior of assembly participants becomes violent and poses a real threat to national and public security, life and health of citizens.

Disproportionate brutal actions of the police aimed at suppressing peaceful assemblies cannot be considered a legitimate activity for the protection and preservation of public order, and in cases of violence used by protesters who were provoked by the same police officers, these actions should be considered based on the severity of the injury and intent to cause such harm, as well as seen as justifiable or necessary defense carried out to protect oneself from clearly unlawful actions of law enforcement officers who had followed unlawful orders.

Apart from that, we note that in the politically motivated cases, the authorities apply imprisonment in violation of the right to a fair trial, as well as other rights and freedoms guaranteed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, discriminating the defendants in comparison with defendants of other analogous cases.

We also note the lack of a proper legal assessment of the actions of law enforcement officers throughout Belarus in the aftermath of the August 2020 presidential election. Acts of torture and other forms of ill-treatment against participants in peaceful assemblies and other residents who violated the law during protests have not been fully investigated. This gives the prosecution of those who have violated the law during protests the traits of selectivity.

According to the Guidelines on the Definition of Political Prisoners, violence that was provoked by the initial disproportionate use of physical force, means of restraint, and if there was no intent to cause non-symbolic material damage or harm to anyone in the actions of the accused, provides grounds to hold these individuals to be political prisoners.

All these circumstances give grounds to claim that the persecution of these persons is politically motivated, and the individuals themselves are political prisoners.

Based on this and guided by paragraph 3.2 (a, b, c, d)of the Guide to the definition of "political prisoner", we recognize Mr. Andrei Siarheyenkau, Mr. Aliaksandr Sakalouski, Mr. Dzmitryi Padlobnikau political prisoners and demand:

  • review the sentences passed against these political prisoners, respect their right to a fair trial, eliminate the factors that influenced the decision to sentence these individuals to imprisonment and release them, having ensured their appearance in court by other means;
  • release all political prisoners.

Human Rights Center Viasna

Lawtrend

Legal initiative

Barys Zvozskau Belarusian Human Rights House

Belarusian Association of Journalists

PEN Belarus

 

Partnership

Membership