Statement on the release of four political prisoners

2021 2021-06-24T19:28:46+0300 2021-07-01T19:13:22+0300 en https://spring96.org/files/images/sources/partyz_marsh_belsut.jpg The Human Rights Center “Viasna” The Human Rights Center “Viasna”
The Human Rights Center “Viasna”

Joint statement of the Belarusian human rights community

Minsk, 24 June 2021

In the light of a number of court verdicts in criminal cases connected with accusations of violence against police officers, forcible resistance to police officers and other officials performing official duties, and disorderly conduct (Articles 363, 364, 366, 339 of the Criminal Code), reaffirming our position stated in the joint statement of human rights organizations of 16 January 2021, we note the following:

Peaceful assemblies of citizens should be protected by the state, and the police should not take actions to forcibly stop them, even if they take place in violation of the procedures for their organization and holding. Violent termination of assemblies and the use of physical force, let alone special means and weapons against protesters should be carried out only as an extreme measure, in cases when the behavior of assembly participants is of violent nature, which poses a real threat to national and public security, life and health of citizens.

Disproportionate brutal actions of the police aimed at suppressing peaceful assemblies cannot be considered as a legitimate activity for the protection and preservation of public order, and in cases of violence used by protesters in reverse provoked by the same police officers, these actions should be considered based on the severity of the injury and intent to cause such harm, and as protection from clearly unlawful actions of law enforcement officers, who followed unlawful orders.

According to the Guidelines on the Definition of Political Prisoner, violence that was provoked by the initial disproportionate use of physical force, means of restraint, and if there was no intent to cause non-symbolic material damage or harm to anyone in the actions of the accused, provides grounds to hold these individuals to be political prisoners.

In addition, monitoring of these trials has shown that the courts impose disproportionately harsh (inadequate) sentences for the offense with which the individuals are charged, compared to sentences imposed in the same categories of cases outside the political context.

The length or conditions of imprisonment imposed on participants in protest assemblies were clearly disproportionate (inadequate) to the offense for which the individuals were found guilty.

In many cases, court hearings were held behind closed doors: members of the public, human rights defenders, and members of the media were not admitted. Court decisions to hold closed sessions were not based on the need to protect state secrets or the personal information of trial participants, which is undesirable for public dissemination.

All of these circumstances give reason to believe that the prosecution of these individuals is politically motivated and that the individuals themselves are political prisoners.

On this basis, and guided by para. 3.2 (a, b, c, d) of the Guidelines on the Definition of Political Prisoner, we recognize the following convicted prisoners as political prisoners:

  1. Yan Dailida (convicted by the Kastryčnicki District Court of Hrodna to three and a half years of restricted freedom in an open-type correctional institution under part 1 of Article 342 of the Criminal Code and article 364 of the Criminal Code, serving his sentence);
  2. Piotr Hretski (sentenced by the Kastryčnicki District Court of Hrodna to three years of restricted freedom in an open-type correctional institution under part 1 of Article 342 of the Criminal Code and Article 364 of the Criminal Code, serving his sentence);
  3. Aliaksandr Patapovich (convicted by Hrodna Region Court as a result of the appeal against the sentence of the first instance court to two and a half years of imprisonment under Article 364 of the Criminal Code);
  4. Mikalai Dzenisevich (sentenced by the Minsk Frunzenski District Court to four-year imprisonment under part 1 of Article 342 of the Criminal Code, Article 364 of the Criminal Code, and part 1 of Article 218 of the Criminal Code, serving his sentence);

We deem it necessary to demand the immediate review of the measures taken against them and the court decisions in the execution of the right to a fair trial and elimination of the said factors, as well as their release from custody employing other measures ensuring their appearance in court.

Human Rights Center "Viasna"
FORB Initiative
Barys Zvozskau Belarusian Human Rights House
PEN Belarus
Legal Initiative
Belarusian Documentation Center
Human Constanta
Belarusian Association of Journalists

Partnership

Membership