Main news
16.03.2010
Week of election campaign: numbers, events and comments
05.03.2010
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2010
01.03.2010
The Implementation of Freedom of Association in 2009
23.02.2010
Election campaign week: events, figures and trends
12.02.2010
Materials from Belarusian NPOs prepared for the Universal Periodic Review of Belarus in the U.N. Committee on Human Rights. October 2009
08.02.2010
Electoral marathon: events, tendencies and figures of the week
02.02.2010
Electoral marathon: numbers and tendencies of the week
28.01.2010
The Death Penalty in Belarus in 2009
19.01.2010
Valiantsin Stefanovich: ‘Ministry of Education should adequately react to its official’s actions’
06.01.2010
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in December 2009
24.12.2009
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
17.12.2009
European Parliament notes lack of democratic progress in Belarus


Supreme Court turns down claim by Nasha Viasna

22.04.2009. Tags: Viasna, registration.

On 22 April the Supreme Court of Belarus turned down the complaint by the founders of the Nasha Viasna human rights organization.
Judge Ihar Milto found the decision by the Ministry of Justice legal due to certain procedural violations, including inaccuracies in the founders’ lists and the organization’s Charter. Besides, state duty payment receipt lacked the name of the NGO. All other arguments of the Ministry of Justice were found legally invalid.
The court stressed that the above-mentioned flaws could not be corrected within the period of registration since the postponement of registration is not the duty but the right of the registration authority.
The Supreme Court also turned down the arguments by the Ministry claiming that Nasha Viasna’s constituent congress had been held with certain violations.
One of the founders of Nasha Viasna Valiantsin Stefanovich declared that ‘the human rights activists do not agree with the decision by the Supreme Court and are going to appeal it in the exercise of the supervisory power of Chair of the Supreme Court.’ ‘We do not agree with the decision since Paragraph 3 of Article 15 of the Law on Public Associations provides an exact and comprehensive list of grounds for possible refusal to register a public association. During the application for registration of Nasha Viasna these points were not violated. Thus, the registration authority should have granted a delay for the correction of the above-mentioned drawbacks.’
Valiantsin Stefanovich also said that Nasha Viasna was going to apply for registration for a third time this week. In case of another refusal, the human rights activists are going to stop addressing the Ministry of Justice. ‘If the state represented by the Ministry of Justice is not ready, does not want or cannot register human rights NGOs, it will be a problem for the state itself. We can perform human rights activities without official registration. It is our legal right, guaranteed by the Constitution and the international human rights standards,’ said Mr.Stefanovich.
Вярхоўны суд

Add commentary

Вы павінны зарэгістравацца or ўвайсьці ў сыстэму , каб мець магчымасьць пакідаць камэнтары

Comments

No commentaries for this article


RATING ALL.BY Яндекс цитирования
продавец-консультант по белью. Бутик матрасов - magniflex. Ортопедические матрасы Magniflex.