Main news
05.03.2010
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2010
01.03.2010
The Implementation of Freedom of Association in 2009
23.02.2010
Election campaign week: events, figures and trends
12.02.2010
Materials from Belarusian NPOs prepared for the Universal Periodic Review of Belarus in the U.N. Committee on Human Rights. October 2009
08.02.2010
Electoral marathon: events, tendencies and figures of the week
02.02.2010
Electoral marathon: numbers and tendencies of the week
28.01.2010
The Death Penalty in Belarus in 2009
19.01.2010
Valiantsin Stefanovich: ‘Ministry of Education should adequately react to its official’s actions’
06.01.2010
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in December 2009
24.12.2009
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
17.12.2009
European Parliament notes lack of democratic progress in Belarus
09.12.2009
Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in November 2009


Supreme Court upholds punishment of members of democratic candidate’s team

06.02.2009. Tags: administrative trials, elections-2008.
Source: BulletinOnline.

On 28 September 2008, the day before the election, three residents of Svetlahorsk, proxies of a candidate to the Parliament, were detained and fined.

All of the detainees believe that the detention was made with the aim to hinder their agitation: the rival of their candidate was Valiantsina Kavalenka, who at that time was an MP and the vice-chair of Svetlahorsk district executive committee. Viktar Akhramchuk, Sviatlana Mikhalchanka and Dzmitry Shavialenka were detained by the police while agitating for a candidate of the United Democratic Forces Siarhei Daineka. They searched the car by which the proxies were driving and found there 56 copies of the Tovarishch newspaper, 15 copies of Hlytok Pavetra and 77 copies of the informational bulletin Vybary-08.

Judge Iryna Aliseika fined them 1.4 million rubles each. As it follows from the materials of the administrative case, the duty policeman of Svetlahorsk district police department wrote in his report ‘a woman who did not introduce herself said that ‘a man was handing out printed editions’. D.Mikhanovich, inspector of the road police of Svetlahorsk district police department, said that during the examination of the car the fact of ‘transportation of political leaflets and newspapers was established’. In his testimony the car driver said that the woman and the men were handing out some newspapers, but he did not see the titles.’

On the basis of this evidence the judge found V.Akhramchuk, S.Mikhalchanka and D.Shevialenka guilty of distribution of the oppositional press.

Then judge Aliseiaka agreed with the police conclusion’s that Hlytok pavetra included the information that insulted the honor and dignity of the president of the Republic of Belarus and that Vybary-08 was a periodical that had no imprint (she qualified the latter as a periodical because the date of issue and the contact E-mail address were printed in it. The judge took the opinion that the issue of Vybary-08 without an imprint was a violation of the law On press and other mass media.

The citizens did not take the blame. At the trial S.Mikhalchanka confessed that she had handed out the Tovarish (a legally registered newspaper). Akhramchuk and Shevialenka stated that they were sticking posters. All of the accused believe that Vybary-08 was not a periodical, but a one-time edition and therefore could not violate the law on press.

At first the activists appealed against the unfair verdict to Homel oblast court. As it gave no result, they applied to the Supreme Court, which also upheld the initial verdict. In his answer the vice-head of the Supremer Court stated that the guilt of the detainees in the violations had been proved well enough.

Add commentary

Вы павінны зарэгістравацца or ўвайсьці ў сыстэму , каб мець магчымасьць пакідаць камэнтары

Comments

No commentaries for this article


RATING ALL.BY Яндекс цитирования