Main news
28.10.2008
New political prisoner appeared in Belarus
20.10.2008
Journalist Vieranika Charkasava Assassinated Four Years Ago
09.10.2008
Review-chronicle of human rights violations in Belarus in September 2008
29.09.2008
Parliamentary Election: Human Rights Defenders draw preliminary conclusions
28.09.2008
INFORMATION FOR JOURNALISTS (updated)
28.09.2008
Pre-election campaigning. Monitoring: results and conclusions
22.09.2008
Election week: events and generalizations
17.09.2008
Valiantsin Stefanovic: authorities have another chance to prosecute opposition members
15.09.2008
Human rights center
08.09.2008
Review-chronicle of human rights violations in Belarus in July-August 2008
05.09.2008
Elections: analysis of the stage of registration of candidates
02.09.2008
Past week of the electoral campaign: events and generalizations


Entrepreneur Sviatlana Dvaraninava on Indefinite Hunger-strike

06.03.2008. Tags: entrepreneurs, criminal persecution, hunger-strike.
Source: BelaPAN.

The entrepreneur Sviatlana Dvaraninava keeps the sixth indefinite hunger-strike in the women’s jail in Homel.

On 25 February she learned that the Supreme Court turned down the cassation appeal of her lawyer against the verdict of Kastrychitski district court of Vitsebsk, by which she was sentenced to 6,5 years of jail. Seeing no other ways to protect her legal rights, on 26 February the entrepreneur went on the sixth hunger-strike.

She states that she does it to ‘protest against gross violation of the criminal and the criminal process code by the investigation, the prosecutor’s offices and the courts of Vitsebsk oblast and Kastrychnitski district of Vitsebsk.’ She demands the abolishment of the unfair verdict. 

Bear in mind that S.Dvaraninava was a co-owner of the Aquarius Ltd., which dealt with clothing manufacture and its wholesale. The enterprise faced economic problems and was not able to pay for the received goods. In 2004 a criminal case was brought against the entrepreneur under two article of the Criminal Code: article 209 (fraud) and 210 (theft with abuse of the official powers). In 2006 she was sentenced to 8 years of jail. Her lawyer appealed against the verdict, after which the term was reduced to 6,5 years.

The lawyer Natallia Tarasiuk considers this verdict unfair. ‘As it is clear from the case, she received the goods from one company and passed it to another. It means that he had no personal profit from it. Besides, the court failed to find cashing of any large sum of money, which could witness that the entrepreneur profited on this situation,’ Tarasiuk points.

The lawyer says that a more appropriate accusation to her client could be ‘evasion from fulfillment creditor’s duties’, but not fraud and theft, as it is stated in the case materials.


Add commentary

Вы павінны зарэгістравацца or ўвайсьці ў сыстэму , каб мець магчымасьць пакідаць камэнтары

Comments

No commentaries for this article

rating all.by Яндекс цитирования