KGB Raid Fellowship of Moscow Patriarchate
In what is to Forum 18`s knowledge the first incident of its type in Belarus since the Soviet period, officers of the KGB secret police raided a prayer meeting in March of approximately 15 Moscow Patriarchate parishioners at a private apartment in the south-eastern city of Homel. One of them was given an official warning in April. ‘Yes, it is unusual, but this is Belarus, and our [2002 Religion] Law is unique’, another of those present told Forum 18 News Service on 22 May. ‘But we are not going to run away and hide - that is not what Christ taught’. Officials have denied knowledge of the raid or the warning to Forum 18.
The group is part of an informal network of Orthodox brotherhoods, the Moscow-based Transfiguration Fellowship under the spiritual directorship of Fr Georgi Kochetkov, who serves at Moscow`s Novodevichy Monastery. Known for his reformist theological views, Fr Georgi was temporarily under a church ban during the late 1990s. His Moscow-based St Philaret Orthodox Christian Institute was licensed by the Moscow Patriarchates Department of Religious Education and Catechism in 2004.
According to the Homel brotherhood member, the group meets for Bible fellowship and to discuss religious literature after Sunday liturgy and also during the week. It was during one such meeting in March at the apartment of member Siarhei Nestsiarovich, he said, that six KGB officers conducted a three-hour search of the premises, downloading data from a computer and confiscating some of Nestsiarovich’s notebooks, as well as questioning and photographing some of those present. The brotherhood member added that the KGB officers introduced themselves as such and explained that they were acting at the request of the local state authorities, ‘because we were conducting unsanctioned religious activity - they said we were a pseudo-Christian sect engaged in the recruitment of members!’
In late April a Belarusian Orthodox website, www.churchby.info , reported that Homel regional prosecutor Aleh Palavinka issued an official warning to Nestsiarovich on 12 April. This stated that a check-up by Homel regional KGB directorate had established that he was breaking the law by leading an unregistered religious community and ‘disseminating religious teachings’. Nestsiarovich could be fined or detained under the Administrative Violations Code if targeted a second time.
The top religious affairs official for Homel region, Mikhail Zhukevich told Forum 18 on 5 June that he had no idea who Siarhei Nestsiarovich was or whether there had been any 12 April warning. ‘If a group is not registered, then another state organ could have issued such a warning’, he remarked. ‘It’s written in black and white in the [2002 Religion] Law - all religious communities must be registered’. Forum 18 then asked Zhukevich for his view of someone leading a religious community and disseminating religious teachings without registration. ‘That’s illegal’, he replied, before again insisting that he knew nothing about the specific case.
Also asked by Forum 18 about the 12 April warning issued to Nestsiarovich, a spokeswoman at Homel regional prosecutor’s office maintained on 1 June that it ‘did not have that information’ and ‘would probably not be able to help’. Reached on 5 June, a spokeswoman at the Office’s department for public relations similarly maintained that it was the first time she had heard about the warning. ‘We have very many cases here’, she explained to Forum 18. ‘I only know about what we put out to the media, and we haven’t issued any information like that.’
Currently unavailable for comment, Nestsiarovich has appealed against the warning, according to a Homel brotherhood member, but has yet to receive a response. He stressed that the group is in full canonical communion with the Belarusian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate), and that its members have never encountered similar problems previously. While speculating that the incident could have been either a misunderstanding or meant as a warning, he also saw it as a consequence of the ‘rather discriminatory’ 2002 Religion Law, under which a religious community requires 20 members to qualify for state registration, ‘which we don’t have’.
The Belarusian Orthodox Church supported the 2002 Religion Law. Among formal proposals made by the Church as the Law was being discussed were a ban on all but irregular worship meetings in private homes and an increase in the minimum number of people needed to register a religious community from ten to 20. Both these proposals were adopted.